000			02713nam a22002777c 4500
001			00004454
003			ES-MaONT
005			20211006062551.0
008			180122s2017 xxu||||fst||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a978-92-846-1991-7
024			_2DOI _a10.2861/11987
040			_cES-MaONT
110			_aParlamento Europeo. _bDirección General de Servicios de Estudios Parlamentarios _93675
245	1		_aIntroduction of a lifespan guarantee in the proposed online sales and digital content directives _bImpact assessment of substantial amendments - Estudio _cEuropean Parliamentary Research Service
260			_c2017
300			_a120 p.
336			_atexto (visual) _2isbdcontent
337			_aelectrónico _2isbdmedia
338			_arecurso en línea _2rdacarrier
520			_aThis study was requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) as part of the Parliament’s general commitment to improving the quality of EU legislation, and in particular in undertaking to carry out impact assessments of its own substantial amendments when it considers it appropriate and necessary for the legislative process. The aim of this study is to conduct an ex-ante impact assessment of proposed substantial amendments from the IMCO and JURI Committees which would introduce a commercial lifespan guarantee. The impacts of these amendments have been analysed through the development of specific policy options. Two non-legislative options, implying that none of the amendments are implemented, are first assessed: an Option zero and a soft law approach (Option 1). Three distinct legislative options are also defined, by integrating specific aspects of the amendments: Option 2 (Subjective duration of lifespan), Option 3 (Normal duration of lifespan) and Option 4 (Binding technical standards for the determination of the lifespan) For each legislative option, two sub-options are developed by considering liability solely on the manufacturer (2a, 3a and 4a), or joint liability with the trader (2b, 3b and 4b). The key findings of the impact assessment reveal that the preferred options are Options 2 and 4. The former is certainly less ambitious than the latter and would result in less benefit overall, but it would also involve less cost and, contrary to Option 4, could be implemented within a relatively short period of time.
650		0	_aTecnologías habilitadoras digitales _918
650		0	_92 _aComercio electrónico
653			_adigitalizacion
856	4		_i0 _uhttps://publications.europa.eu/es/publication-detail/-/publication/1aa6ed22-ff3b-11e7-b8f5-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-62664097 _yAcceso al documento _x0
942			_2udc _cINF
999			_c4454 _d4454