000 | 03984nam a22004810i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c5240 _d5240 |
||
001 | 00005240 | ||
003 | LU-LuOPE | ||
005 | 20211006062615.0 | ||
008 | 190806s2019 eu fs i000 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a978-92-846-5044-6 | ||
024 | 7 |
_a10.2861/535 _2doi |
|
029 | 7 | _aQA-02-19-516-EN-N | |
029 | 7 | _aPE 634.445 | |
035 | _aPUB_QA0219516ENN | ||
039 | 9 |
_a201908132202 _bVLOAD _c201908132152 _dVLOAD _c201908131528 _dfoucajo |
|
040 |
_aLU-LuOPE _cES-MaONT |
||
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBlockchain and the general data protection regulation : _bCan distributed ledgers be squared with European data protection law? |
260 |
_a[Luxemburgo] : _bOficina de Publicaciones, _c[2019] |
||
300 |
_aviii, 105 p. ; _c1 documento PDF |
||
336 |
_2isbdcontent _atexto |
||
337 |
_2isbdmedia _ainformático |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _arecurso en línea |
||
500 | _aManuscript completed in July 2019. | ||
503 | _aUA_BIB : NPAG 103-105. | ||
520 | _aBlockchain is a much-discussed instrument that, according to some, promises to inaugurate a new era of data storage and code-execution, which could, in turn, stimulate new business models and markets. The precise impact of the technology is, of course, hard to anticipate with certainty, in particular as many remain sceptical of blockchain's potential impact. In recent times, there has been much discussion in policy circles, academia and the private sector regarding the tension between blockchain and the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Indeed, many of the points of tension between blockchain and the GDPR are due to two overarching factors. First, the GDPR is based on an underlying assumption that in relation to each personal data point there is at least one natural or legal person – the data controller – whom data subjects can address to enforce their rights under EU data protection law. These data controllers must comply with the GDPR's obligations. Blockchains, however, are distributed databases that often seek to achieve decentralisation by replacing a unitary actor with many different players. The lack of consensus as to how (joint-) controllership ought to be defined hampers the allocation of responsibility and accountability. Second, the GDPR is based on the assumption that data can be modified or erased where necessary to comply with legal requirements, such as Articles 16 and 17 GDPR. Blockchains, however, render the unilateral modification of data purposefully onerous in order to ensure data integrity and to increase trust in the network. Furthermore, blockchains underline the challenges of adhering to the requirements of data minimisation and purpose limitation in the current form of the data economy. This study examines the European data protection framework and applies it to blockchain technologies so as to document these tensions. It also highlights the fact that blockchain may help further some of the GDPR's objectives. Concrete policy options are developed on the basis of this analysis. | ||
540 |
_aReproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy ; _bUnión Europea. |
||
650 | 0 |
_aTecnologías habilitadoras digitales _918 |
|
653 | 7 | _aBlockchain | |
653 | 7 | _aprotección de datos | |
653 | 7 | _adatos personales | |
653 | 7 | _alegislación | |
653 | 7 | _aprotección de la vida privada | |
653 | 7 | _aDerecho de la informática | |
653 | 7 | _aderecho del individuo | |
700 | 1 |
_aFinck, Michèle _93173 |
|
710 |
_aParlamento Europeo. _bDirección General de Servicios de Estudios Parlamentarios _93675 |
||
856 | 4 | 2 |
_qHTML _uhttp://publications.europa.eu/publication/manifestation_identifier/PUB_QA0219516ENN _x0 _yAcceso al documento |
856 | 4 | 2 |
_qHTML _uhttps://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/535 _x0 _yAcceso al documento |
901 | _aDOI registered | ||
910 | _aFree | ||
911 | _aStudies | ||
942 |
_2z _cINF |